JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 3, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Abelardo De Jesús Legarda Lastra

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia. Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal De San Jerónimo, Juzgado Promiscuo Del Circuito De Santa Fe De Antioquia Y Tribunal Administrativo De Antioquia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Entidades del orden departamental y descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente al Juzgado Promiscuo del Circuito de Santa Fe de Antioquia para que adelante la correspondiente actuación judicial, de acuerdo con lo dispuesto en la parte final del numeral 1º del Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000, “cuando la acción de tutela se promueva contra más de una autoridad y éstas sean de diferente nivel, el reparto se hará al juez de mayor jerarquía, de conformidad con las reglas establecidas en el presente numeral”.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. REMITIR el expediente al Juzgado Promiscuo del Circuito de Santa Fe de Antioquia para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.